shadows bring the starlight;

alanawill:

But, like, let’s all just take a second. (This is from my Twitter account I used to use back in the day for fandom purposes and resurrected solely to ask this question hence the name chosen in a panic but YEAH THIS HAPPENED).

→Just gonna cocoon myself over here.: The significance of Hannibal titles

Watching tonight’s Hannibal with flawlessanna, I got a bit curious about the titles for each episode. So I looked them up and here are my findings.

Apéritif - An apéritif is an alcoholic beverage often served before a meal to increase appetite. Common apéritifs include champagne, vermouth, and…

40 notes / Reblog

llecters:

im

41 notes / Reblog

139

Men still have trouble recognizing that a woman can be complex, can have ambition, good looks, sexuality, erudition, and common sense. A woman can have all those facets, and yet men, in literature and in drama, seem to need to simplify women, to polarize us as either the whore or the angel.

(Source: nataliesdormers, via itsbetterthananoooperaaa)

18,081 notes / Reblog

11,572 notes / Reblog

427

3664

71006

cpljohnner:

hiddensidekick:

bratkitty:

the-watchful-metatron:

sherlockingthehobbitstoasgard:

walkingkatastrophe:

epik-nomz:

danglingthpider:

theperpetualboy:

This.

im tired of people using god to justify their prejudice

Leviticus is a list of old laws that were never relevant after its time period so when people pull Leviticus to back banning gay marriage just remind them Jesus said nothing about gay marriage but he exclusively condemned divorce.

Thank you for that ^^^^

The thing that pisses me off most about people calling on Leviticus (at least Christians.) is that they are old laws that were supposedly put into place to punish us for our sins thus far. When Jesus died to cleanse us of our sins, it wasn’t just about our future sins and the ability to ask for absolution…. but to be free of our previous sins. So, a Christian quoting the old laws is like saying… Sorry Jesus, your sacrifice just wasn’t good enough because it doesn’t allow me to justify my hate and want to torment someone else because I personally disagree with it. (which is the God Damnedest sin.)
This brings my rant to one of the golden rules that we as Christians claim to live by. “Thou shalt not use MY name in vain.”
That doesn’t mean “Jesus Christ! Oops, don’t use his name in vain, LoL!” It means don’t use God to justify your hate mongering. It means don’t claim God hates this or that or allows you to hurt others because you say he does.
The hugely common misinterpretation of this pisses me off to no end because it’s an incredibly insulting, OBVIOUS misinterpretation of it to please one’s self.

I am an atheist and I approve of this message.

I am a Christan and approve this message

^ Ditto

(Source: swarkleshimymnphanddb, via stiefelhead)

543 notes / Reblog